Saturday, September 29, 2012

Hooniverse Asks- What's the Next Automotive Purchase You're ...

Remember back a couple of ?years ago when the economy looked like something out of a documentary on North Korea? Yeah, that sucked, and I?ll bet most of you didn?t plan any major durable goods purchases, especially ones that you parked in the garage. But things are looking up for many of us, and perhaps now there?s plenty of pent up demand for replacing that creaky washer and dryer, or maybe adding to the fleet. And if that last part is true for you, we want to know what you?re itching to pull the trigger on.

Truth be told, there are a lot of cars out today ? models that weren?t available even three years ago ? that are like holy balls amazing. Ford?s new Fusion is arguably about the best looking mid-sizer you can buy, and it offers a selection of drivetrain choices that would put 31 Flavors to shame. Not only that, but it seems like now is still a great time to snap up some classic iron, as prices for cars like Ferrari 308s, Triumph TR6s, two-seat T-birds and a bunch of others are just now starting to on the bottom step of the escalator, the perfect opportunity to get in, enjoy, and later make a few bucks.

So what are you planning to do with all that hard-earned cash cluttering up your bank account? Are you going to buy something with wheels? Or maybe you?ve had your eye on something that allows you to work on those wheels, maybe a TIG welder or new air compressor? Let?s not limit this conversation to cars and trucks alone, but be inclusive of all your big ticket garage plans. Of all those possibilities, what?automotive purchase are you next planning to make?

Image: [SeattleWeekly]

Related posts:

  1. Hooniverse Weekend Edition: Automotive Traveler Image Gallery, Available for Purchase!
  2. Hooniverse Asks- What Hot Hatch Needs to Make a Comeback?
  3. Hooniverse Asks-What Car Manufacturer Should Really Make a Bike?
  4. Hooniverse Asks-What 1970s Auto Accessory Should Make a Comeback?
  5. Hooniverse Asks ? Should Woodgrain on Wagons Make a Comeback?

Source: http://hooniverse.com/2012/09/28/hooniverse-asks-whats-the-next-automotive-purchase-youre-planning-to-make/

Carly Rae Jepsen bankofamerica nfl schedule revolution rosh hashanah rosh hashanah WWE

iMore Show 315: iPhone 5 review

Rene reviews the iPhone 5, from the 4-inch screen to the Apple A6 processor to LTE to iOS 6 on the tall screen. It's everything you need to know about the iPhone 5 in one hour! This is the iMore show!

Show notes

Hosts

Credits

You can reach all of us on Twitter @iMore, or you can email us at podcast@imore.com or just leave us a comment below.

For all our podcasts -- audio and video -- including the iMore show, ZEN and TECH, Iterate, and more, see MobileNations.com/shows

Thanks to the iMore Accessory Store for sponsoring this week's show. Your one-stop-shop for everything iPhone and iPad, including cables, cases, chargers, Bluetooth and much more, check out store.imore.com.



Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/Z6NLpMEE9rM/story01.htm

sports illustrated swimsuit 2012 aretha franklin whitney houston paul williams paul babeu kevin costner budweiser shootout animal house

Friday, September 28, 2012

What Separates The Million Dollar Information Marketers From The ...

I was recently given access to the latest version of Jeff Walker?s Product Launch Formula course (Jeff was kind of enough to grant me access as a top affiliate and buyer of a previous version of the course).

As is typical for me, I went straight in looking for any audios I could download and stick on my phone (I?m on a HTC One X in case you are interested) for listening to when I go for morning skates or while traveling in the car or by bus.

The first section I went to was recordings of previous live events. I love presentations from events, but because I live in Australia I usually don?t travel to the events since they are in the USA. I prefer to listen to them in one or two hour chunks rather than full days, so recordings suit me perfectly.

A very old photo of Rich, a long-haired Yaro and Mike Filsaime

The audio I just finished listening to is from Rich Schefren and a presentation he did at Product Launch Formula Live in 2011. I was very keen to listen to this particular audio because I haven?t heard much from Rich in recent years and he hadn?t done any launches during that time either, as far as I could tell. Considering it was a presentation from an event all about doing launches, I was curious what he would talk about.

Rich and Eben Pagan are my favorite trainers when it comes to selling information products online. I like how cerebral both guys are, they both think deeply about subjects and are two of the most well read guys around when it comes to marketing and business. Plus they have multi-million dollar businesses, so clearly they can walk the walk.

This presentation from Rich had a handful of useful nuggets, as always. Today I want to share with you two of the most interesting topics as they relate to us bloggers and information marketers.

What Is The Key Determinant For A Million Dollar Launch?

Rich talked quite a bit about launches, as you would expect. There was however one topic he touched on briefly that really piqued my interest.

He explained his opinion for what sets apart a million dollar launch and ?the rest?, all those launches that might make thousands of dollars, but not quite break the really big time.

I have long pondered this subject myself and have discussed it with Gideon Shalwick before and after our own launches. Gideon and I have had plenty of six figure launches, and I?ve had a few on my own too, but I?ve never come close to a million dollar launch.

When I began preparation for my first ever launch I followed the formula. I even went so far as to hire people that I ended up not really needing, like a JV manager.

Initially I planned to launch at a pricing point around the same as the big launches I had seen recently in my industry at the time ? around the $1,000 mark for a home study program. Later I changed my mind because putting together the product in advance was slowing me down.

Instead I decided to go with the membership model so I could build the majority of the product after I sold it. As a result of this I priced my offer much lower. The first iteration was $47 a month, with no preset end time, though I did eventually decide on a six month course.

My result was good, about 400 initial sign-ups, although at that stage I had high attrition, so it dropped to around 300 after the first two months, with more dropping each month as the rebill periods hit. Despite my attrition I made over $100,000 from that first product launch, not a bad result.

Consider though, if I had charged $1,000 for the product, or as has become more common in my industry, $2,000 for the product. At 400 units, that $800,000 or $400,000 at $1,000 each.

I concluded at this point that the key to a million dollar launch was to charge in the four figure area for each unit. Obviously you have to sell fewer units to make big money and the marketing isn?t all that different regardless of what you charge.

That being said, you need the right justification for charging what you charge. You also need access to the kind of people who are financially able to spend that kind of money.

My thinking has always been along these lines for the justification behind what it takes to break the million dollar mark when doing a launch -

  1. Charge at least $1,000 for the product. No doubt there are examples of low priced products selling in the tens of thousands to break a million dollars in revenue, but as far as I can tell, that?s not as common, and certainly not in my industry.
  2. Have access to people who spend that kind of money. You need these people on your own list or access to affiliates who have these kinds of people.
  3. Have the proof to back up the price. If your best examples and case studies, especially from your own personal background or your client?s examples are from making $10,000, it?s harder to justify a higher price, compared to being able to talk about how you have made millions and helped others do the same.

So in summary, the right offer, to the right people with the right proof, are key for a million dollar launch. At least, that was my assumption as someone who has only seen them happen and not done one myself.

Innovation In Your Launch

According to Rich, he hasn?t done a launch that has made less than $2 million. That?s a pretty good track record.

Of course Rich has some quality friends who have massive email lists, guys who he reached out to as a coach, mentor and friend before doing his first launch. When the time came to do a launch the right support was there ready to go.

He also has plenty of million dollar business success stories behind him, from the days before he was an internet entrepreneur and had brick and mortar businesses (a fashion store in New York and an hypnosis chain are two prominent examples). There?s plenty of proof of his business acumen.

Rich already had in place what I considered the most important ingredients for a million dollar launch. However he said there is another key differentiator, which leaders apply that separates them from the pack and increases their financial return.

Rich stated that he believes the key to a million dollar launch is innovation. Doing what has been done before isn?t going to make you a leader or more importantly, garner the attention you need to make the big sales.

Rich has practiced this principle, first by releasing some incredible free reports before it was common practice, and doing other things like broadcasting a live stream from an event (I was actually at that particular event in Florida), where he made a pitch to purchase access to watch the rest of the event that sold out in 3 minutes.

More recently he did a live 24 hour stream from his office as part of the launch of another product. He answered questions live from the audience, had guest come on and managed to stay awake the whole time. Again, this was something no one in our industry had done, so just seeing what a guy looks like after 23 straight hours broadcasting was a compelling story.

These were Rich?s attempts to innovate and get attention, using new methods each time. Doing just another report or a video sequence in an industry flooded with new reports and video sequences is not enough to get you the big successes. You can still do well with these methods, but according to Rich, the innovators who use new ideas to get attention, they will be the people who make millions in future launches.

The key word here is ?attention?. You can continue to deliver great value using the same formats and you will have a loyal following. However if you want rapid growth and the truly big success stories, you need the attention of new people. You can reach a heck of a lot of new people in a short time frame thanks to the viral nature of the Internet, if your idea catches fire.

Launch Addiction

At the end of the presentation Rich explained why he stopped doing launches. I was very interested to hear about this because as many people in my industry know, there is a sense of ?launch fatigue? setting in.

Anyone who has ever done a launch knows the drawbacks. You get a nice big boost of cash, customers and exposure in a short period of time, but then it?s over. You don?t have an ongoing cash flow source, you can?t test and tweak much because what you have for sale is only available for a couple of weeks.

Rich explained that launches helped him bring in several million dollars, cement his position in our industry and created an instant list ? a following of thousands of people who now care about what he stands for (I wouldn?t be writing this about him right now if it wasn?t for the impact his first launch/report/product had on me).

He then went on to build a business, hiring people and creating new products which were subsequently launched. The problem was that he had created a ?monster? that needed to be fed all the time. That monster refers to his company and all the expenses that came with it, especially all the salaries.

Rich said they became addicted to launches because he needed to keep feeding the monster. Unfortunately as a result, he gained a lot of weight and certainly didn?t have balance in his life. I?ve met a lot of internet marketers who have this issue. They work too hard and feel they need to make sure their business is always growing.

Rich made a decision to break free from this habit by attempting to set up a business based on a sustainable cash flow model, and not launches. He thought that if he couldn?t change the model, pay his bills and profit, then he could keep doing launches, but he?d scale down his company considerably so he could keep more of the launch profits.

Jeff Walker is a good example of a guy who makes the launch model work well because he keeps his cost base so low. One launch a year that brings in a couple of million probably leaves him with somewhere around $800 to $1 Million in profit. He doesn?t have many staff to pay, and keeps his operations lean, so it works.

Rich on the other hand wanted something where he knew every month money was coming in at a dependable rate and there were elements his staff could work on to improve performance.

To do this, he moved away from launches and set up an evergreen selling process using webinars. His webinars and products are always available. He knows what an opt-in is worth to him, so his company can spend a lot of time buying traffic knowing they will make a profit in return. From there they just work on the standard metrics that matter most ? traffic and conversion.

This is the traditional sales funnel model, one that Eben Pagan, who also does launches, uses in his businesses too.

Launches, Evergreen Products, Which Is Best?

I?ve enjoyed making some solid income from launches and also some fairly dependable, but perhaps not as significant income from having products stay on the market.

In terms of work load, doing a launch is a lot of work, but once it is done, doing subsequent launches or relaunches of the same product is a lot easier. It?s also fairly easy to do a launch, then later set your product up as available on an ongoing basis (this is what Leslie has done recently with Become A Blogger Premium).

The key step, which I have to be honest I have never executed, is to properly establish a sales funnel. The process, if done right, is to set up some kind of consistent income stream from a product (or really a sequence of products) you have on the market that keeps paying you something, which may or may not be ?launched?.

Once left on the market, testing and tweaking is performed to improve conversion and determine how much each lead is worth to you. Once that number is established, you know you can spend up to that amount to bring in new leads. If you make on average $10 per lead, then you know you can spend up to that amount to buy new leads using whatever traffic sources you want to (PPC, SEO, Facebook, Display Ads, etc).

The hard part, and the reason why I have never really established a proper sales funnel and worked out my visitor value (lead value), is that the testing process does not float my boat. I find creating product fun, and launching is fun too because it?s new and it only takes a few weeks to get a bunch of customers.

Testing your copy, your offer, traffic flows and all the other elements is not nearly as exciting, but it?s where the real value is generated if you want to establish reliable cash flow. Some people love this stuff, but if you don?t, you?re going to need to find someone else to do it for you, or just force yourself to do the work knowing the reward is worth it.

The Entrepreneur?s Dream

You can do really well without ever having an evergreen heavily tested sales funnel business, but guys like Rich and Eben prove that there is much value in setting up the systems that leverage the sales funnel model.

If you have people doing all the testing and tweaking for you, then you can settle back and do what you enjoy, just as Rich does. He spends his time reading books and keeping on top of all the latest ideas and trends, and then processes and teaches these ideas to his clients.

Every time Rich learns something he wants to try in his business, he can just tell his team to go investigate it and then test it. That?s a pretty awesome place to be as an entrepreneur: Have an idea and then have other people see if it works for you.

If you?re keen to see exactly how Rich manages to sell so much of his product you can see it all in action by watching one of his webinars.

Listening to talks like what Rich delivered at Jeff?s event makes me excited about information marketing again. I?m keen to get something on the market so I can begin to finally build a proper funnel and deliver value to the people who want more from me.

That?s something I?m working on right now. If you?re thinking information marketing is the way to go too, but you?re not sure about doing launches, experiencing what Rich does is definitely worth the effort. Perhaps an evergreen product that you sell through webinars is the path you want to take too.

Yaro Starak
Studying Up

Source: http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/11254/what-separates-the-million-dollar-information-marketers/

franchise tag lesotho a wrinkle in time benjamin netanyahu storm shelters nick lachey chevy volt

Immunologists find a molecule that puts the brakes on inflammation

ScienceDaily (Sep. 28, 2012) ? We couldn't live without our immune systems, always tuned to detect and eradicate invading pathogens and particles. But sometimes the immune response goes overboard, triggering autoimmune diseases like lupus, asthma or inflammatory bowel disease.

A new study led by University of Pennsylvania researchers has now identified a crucial signaling molecule involved in counterbalancing the immune system attack.

"The immune response is like driving a car," said Christopher Hunter, professor and chair in the Department of Pathobiology in Penn's School of Veterinary Medicine. "You hit the accelerator and develop this response that's required to protect you from a pathogen, but, unless you have a brake to guide the response, then you'll just careen off the road and die because you can't control the speed of the response."

The research to characterize this immune system "brake" was led by Hunter and Aisling O'Hara Hall, a doctoral candidate in the Immunology Graduate Group. Additional Penn collaborators included scientists from the Penn Genome Frontiers Institute's Department of Biology and the Perelman School of Medicine's Department of Medicine. Researchers from Merck Research Laboratories, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Harvard Medical School and Janssen Research and Development also contributed to the work, which was published in the journal Immunity.

"Healthy people have these cells -- you have them, I have them -- that are called Tregs," or regulatory T cells, Hunter said. "If you don't have them you develop spontaneous inflammation and disease."

Different forms of regulatory T cells operate as the brakes on various kinds of inflammation, but, until now, scientists hadn't been certain of how these Tregs became specialized to do their particular jobs.

Hall, Hunter and colleagues decided to follow up on a molecule called IL-27. Scientists used to think IL-27 played a role in causing inflammation, but, in 2005, a team of Penn researchers, including Hunter, found the opposite; it was actually involved in suppressing inflammation. Thus, when mice that lack IL-27 are challenged with the parasite Toxoplasma gondii, they develop overwhelming inflammation.

"We never worked out how it did that, but it was a paradigm change at the time," Hunter said.

In the new study, the researchers delved deeper into IL-27's role. They found that exposing regulatory T cells to IL-27 promoted their ability to suppress a particular type of inflammation. The Penn-led team also demonstrated that they could rescue infected IL-27-deficient mice by giving them a transfusion of regulatory T cells. This finding suggests that IL-27 is required to produce the Treg cells that normally keep inflammatory responses in check during infection.

"Very surprisingly, we were able to show that the Tregs could ameliorate the pathology in this system," Hall said. "We don't think this is the only mechanism by which IL-27 limits immune pathology, but it sheds light on one mechanism by which it could be functioning."

Further experiments showed that Tregs express a different suite of genes in the presence of IL-27 as compared to another molecule that has been implicated in this process, interferon gamma, or IFN-?. The researchers' findings indicate that the two molecules have division of labor when it comes to suppressing inflammation: IL-27 seems to be important in helping control inflammation at the site of inflammation, whereas IFN-? appears more significant in the peripheral tissues.

"At the site of inflammation, where you're getting your pathology, that's where IL- 27 is important," Hall said.

With a new understanding of how IL-27 may cause a class of Tregs to become specialized inflammation fighters, researchers have a new target for ameliorating the unwanted inflammation associated with all kinds of autoimmune conditions.

"Now we have a molecular signature that may be relevant in inflammatory bowel disease, in multiple sclerosis, in colitis and Crohn's disease, in rheumatoid arthritis, in lupus," Hunter said.

Next on tap, the team plans to study IL-27 in the context of asthma, lupus and arthritis.

In addition to Hall and Hunter, the authors included Beena John, Claudia Gonz?lez Lombana, Gretchen Harms Pritchard, Jonathan S. Silver, Jason S. Stumhofer, Tajie H. Harris, Elia D. Tait Wojno, Sagie Wagage and Philip Scott of Penn Vet's Department of Pathobiology; Daniel P. Beiting, David S. Roos and Sara Cheery of the Penn Genome Frontiers Institute Department of Biology; Steven Reiner, formerly of the Penn Department of Medicine; Cristina M. Tato and Daniel Cua of Merck Research Laboratories; Yasmine Belkaid, Guillaume Oldenhove, Nicolas Bouladoux and John Grainger of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease; Laurence A. Turka of Harvard Medical School; and M. Merle Elloso of Janssen Research and Development.

The study was supported by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the National Institutes of Health.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of Pennsylvania.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Aisling?O?Hara Hall, Daniel?P. Beiting, Cristina Tato, Beena John, Guillaume Oldenhove, Claudia?Gonzalez Lombana, Gretchen?Harms Pritchard, Jonathan?S. Silver, Nicolas Bouladoux, Jason?S. Stumhofer, Tajie?H. Harris, John Grainger, Elia?D.?Tait Wojno, Sagie Wagage, David?S. Roos, Philip Scott, Laurence?A. Turka, Sara Cherry, Steven?L. Reiner, Daniel Cua, Yasmine Belkaid, M.?Merle Elloso, Christopher?A. Hunter. The Cytokines Interleukin 27 and Interferon-? Promote Distinct Treg Cell Populations Required to Limit Infection-Induced Pathology. Immunity, 2012; 37 (3): 511 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.014

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_health/~3/YVzL_Eb6Ogg/120928125304.htm

chris christie little league world series us open tennis us open tennis aaliyah Empire State Building shooting Republican National Convention

How to Make Top Notch Basketball Recruiting Videos

'; } if (google_ads[0].bidtype == "CPC") { /* insert this snippet for each ad call */ google_adnum = google_adnum + google_ads.length; } } document.write(ad_code); } google_ad_client = "ca-pub-9879162776784828"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '3'; google_ad_type = "text"; google_targeting = "content"; google_ad_channel = "0402111599"; google_feedback = 'on'; google_skip = google_adnum; google_hints = "basketball recruiting video,basketball recruiting video tips,college basketball highlight video,college basketball recruiting tips,high school basketball highlight video,how to make a basketball recruiting video";

Basketball recruitment videos are not centered around five minutes of your best clips, like football and other sports are. Why? Because it is easy to throw together five minutes of action shots of a basketball player at their best. In order for a basketball recruiter to get a feel for a player, they will want to see at least one full game (and possibly more).

Source: http://www.squidoo.com/basketball-recruiting-video

ricky gervais napoleon dynamite michelle williams the descendants the descendants homeland homeland

Thursday, September 27, 2012

PST: Friedel?s time in Tottenham goal waning

It seems that French No. 1 Hugo Lloris will be in Tottenham goal today in a Capital One Cup match against third-tier Carlisle United.

I know what Spurs manager Andre Villas-Boas says about his goalkeeping situation, that former U.S. international Brad Friedel is his man until further notice.

But we know how these things work. Pressure builds to get the $19 million transfer on the field. Lloris is already making noise. Voices from beyond are lending their support and saying that Lloris will soon be top man in goal at White Hart Lane.

Lloris is already Tottenham?s man for Europa League play; He?ll work the gloves today at Brunton Park (capacity 17,000). Villas-Boas says there will be several lineup changes from the weekend?s EPL result over Queens Park Rangers when Spurs meet the third-tier English side today.

Plus, I see Spurs fans beginning to pick nits in Friedel?s game. He?s not the distributor that Lloris is. His shot-stopping is fine, as always, but does he do enough to command the area and claim the balls that Lloris would presumably go gobble up?

Check out the comments here and you?ll see what I mean. No, lineup selections aren?t made by blogging comments. But public opinion and punditry often fuse to form a powerful force. So the first little wobble (and there will always be a wobble here and there, even for the very best player the world has ever seen) becomes the opening to acquiesce, if only to vent some pressure.

Prediction: Friedel will be a Spurs backup by the middle of October.

Not saying it should happen ? just saying that this Hugo Lloris thing is an unstoppable force that it will happen sooner rather than later.

Source: http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/26/brad-friedels-time-in-tottenham-goal-appears-to-be-closing/related/

beasley trailblazers michael beasley jermaine jones hbo luck unc asheville stephen jackson

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Sounders still alive for 4th Cup

TUKWILA, Wash. ? The dream is still alive. Three-time defending champions, Seattle punched their ticket to Kansas City for a chance to claim a their record fourth-straight U.S. Open Cup title, downing Chivas USA 4-1 at Starfire Sports Complex on Wednesday.

Man of the Match: Osvaldo Alonso continues to make this tournament his own. His 31st minute through ball for Eddie Johnson set up the opening score, while his second half conversion of a penalty drawn by Fredy Montero punched Seattle?s ticket to Kansas City.

Two other Sounders have claims to this honor. Johnson?s run on the opening goal was more valuable than Alonso?s pass, and his finish portrayed a man who has put four confidence-draining years behind him. In addition to drawing the foul that set up the game-winning goal, Montero was the match?s hardest worker, constantly making himself available for passes from midfield. Whether it was a message or just a break in the routine, Sigi Schmid?s Saturday benching seems to have worked.

Packaged for takeaway:

  • Both teams started strong teams, and although Seattle looked better from the start (particularly going down their right, with right back Zach Scott playing directly to Fredy Montero), Chivas USA had a number of things to build on:
    • Raushawn McKenzie?made up for a Jorge Villafana?s ineffectiveness at left back while also putting in some nice work to prevent the connections to Montero from generating chances.
    • Ben Zemanski was giving one of his best performances of the season on the left midfield, proving Chivas?s best man on the ball.
    • And on the small Starfire pitch, Oswaldo Minda proved particularly problematic in the middle. The Ecuadorian destroyer never had to range far from his spot at the base of midfield to disrupt play.
  • That?s why it was surprising when the opening goal was generated through the middle. Alonso pounced on a turnover just inside Chivas?s half, at which point Eddie Johnson burst into a great run from the right flank, tearing open Chivas?s defense. EJ sprinted past Villafana, behind McKenzie (who came out to challenge Alonso), and was kept on by Danny Califf, caught four-to-five yards behind his central defense partner. A nice ball from Alonso, one touch from Johnson, and Dan Kennedy was set up. An easy finish gave Seattle the lead.
  • Given Chivas USA had yet to show anything in attack, it was a particularly painful opening goal. There was nothing in Robin Fraser?s team that said they had a comeback in them. Finishing the first half without a shot (let alone a shot on goal), Chivas never seemed to adjust to the small field. Various attempts to switch the ball and change their angle of attack left them looking pensive and ill-prepared when the Sounders were able to quickly close them down.
  • Two minutes into the second half, Montero drew the penalty that would provide Seattle?s game-winner. If Fraser had instilled a winning plan?at half time, Chivas were never able to see it. Before the teams had even warmed up, Seattle had doubled their lead.
  • Of course, it wouldn?t be that easy. Seattle couldn?t just take control and close out the match, though they tried. For the next 25 minutes, it was all Chivas USA could do to keep Montero off the scoresheet, Seattle?s star attacker continuing to exploit the left side of the Chivas USA defense, turning Villafana?s night into a nightmare.
  • The effort was enough to create a huge Man of the Match debate, one that goes to the heart of how to pick the honor. I sided with Alonso because, in addition to being his usual pesky self and doing a good job distributing from the middle, he was involved in each of the first two goals. For all the torment Montero caused the Chivas defense, wasn?t producing an end result.
  • The missed chances looked like they might matter when Chivas USA substitute Cesar Romero bundled his way through Seattle?s defense in the 74th minute, eventually poking a ball past Bryan Meredith from seven yards out. Shockingly, Chivas USA was within one.
  • Seattle restored their two-goal lead 10 minutes later, with Montero finally getting onto the scoresheet. A ball played from the left flank saw him 30 yards from goal with a chance to run at McKenzie and Califf. As the defenders backed off, it looked like Montero was lining up a shot from distance. The threat froze the defenders, allowing Brad Evans?to get forward, into the right of the box, and onto a Montero ball for Seattle?s third goal.
  • Four minutes later, Villafana?s inability to clear a ball allowed Sammy Ochoa, just off the bench, to come from behind, take the ball, turn and finish into the left of net. Kennedy didn?t even bother diving, disgusted at what had just transpired.
  • Perhaps Seattle didn?t look three goals better, but it?s hard to argue with the result. Even when Chivas USA pulled to within one, the game never seemed in doubt. Chivas had no way to get at Seattle, and with the weakness down their left, there was no way they were going to contain the Sounders.
  • Now, for the second time in their U.S. Open Cup run, Seattle has to go on the road to secure their title. Their fist of three titles was won at RFK Stadium against D.C. United. If they?re to take a record fourth-in-a-row, they?ll need to knock off Sporting at Livestrong.

Source: http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/12/us-open-cup-semifinals-seattle-4-1-chivas-usa/related

nevis 2012 sports illustrated swimsuit same day flower delivery valentines day westminster dog show valentines day cards hallmark